The Meaning of Living Together: A Phenomenological Study of University Students in Bandung, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46576/ijsseh.v7i1.8006Kata Kunci:
Living Together, Cohabitation, Construction of Meaning, Phenomenology, Student, Socio Cultural Values.Abstrak
This study aims to explore the construction of meaning behind the phenomenon of living together (cohabitation) among students in Bandung City. Using Edmund Husserl's phenomenological approach, this qualitative research reveals the motives, meanings, and responses of students towards the practice of living with a partner without marriage ties. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with students and analyzed thematically. The findings reveal that the decision to engage in living together is driven by a complex interaction between pragmatic-external motives (such as economic and time efficiency) and personal-emotional motives (such as the need for closeness and compatibility testing). The meanings attributed to this practice vary, ranging from a pre-marital simulation, a violation of norms, an expression of freedom, to a means of developing emotional independence. Although aware of the negative impacts (social stigma, reputation risks, and gender inequality), students still consider the personal benefits of cohabitation. This study concludes that living together for students is a liminal space full of negotiation between traditional and modern values, where meaning is formed subjectively through their direct lived experience (lifeworld).
Referensi
Aisy, M. R., Fadia, M. F., Salsabila, M., & Putra, P. (2025). Perubahan nilai dan norma pada masyarakat: Studi sosial di era globalisasi. Jurnal Cakrawala Akademika, *1*(6), 2219-2202.
Beauparlant, A., Willoughby, B. J., Vennum, A., & Carroll, J. S. (2025). Motives for cohabitation: A latent profile analysis of a national sample. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075251317206
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.
Butt, S. (2023). The new Indonesian Criminal Code: Context and controversies. Australian Journal of Asian Law, *23*(2), 1-10.
Foran, H. M., Willoughby, B. J., Hersh, E., Houts, R. M., & Slep, A. M. S. (2022). Long-term outcomes of cohabitation: A review of relationship dynamics and stability. Journal of Family Issues, *43*(8), 2043-2065. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X221085458
Hasan, P. (2023). Menyoal penelitian fenomenologis: Kerangka filosofis, konsepsi dan desain. Edusifa: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, *9*(1), 37-51.
Kadir, A. (2024). Persepsi mahasiswa atas kriminalisasi kumpul kebo dalam KUHP baru. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, *54*(1), 67-85.
Kuang, B., Wang, L., & Liu, Y. (2025). Gender differences in attitudes toward cohabitation: A qualitative synthesis. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, *51*(1), 1-20.
Mernitz, S. E., Dush, C. M. K., & Johnson, M. K. (2023). Cohabitation in young adulthood: A grounded theory approach to relationship stability and meaning. Journal of Marriage and Family, *85*(2), 412-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12878
Mulyana, A. (2023). Analisis normatif terhadap pasal kumpul kebo dalam KUHP baru. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, *12*(2), 145-160.
Ramadhan, A., Sukmayanti, A. W., Perdana, G. A., & Rukmana, O. (2025). Marriage or freedom? Indonesia's Generation-Z dilemma in the midst of social and economic pressure. Journal of Social Research, *4*(7), 1767-1780.
Yeung, W. J. (2024). Family change in Asia: Emerging trends in cohabitation, delayed marriage, and diversity in family forms. Journal of Family Theory & Review, *16*(1), 24-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12550
11.jpg){kind=logo}
