Evaluation Of Design Change Risks On Time And Quality Control In Apartment Projects In Samarinda City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46576/ijsseh.v7i1.8426Kata Kunci:
Risk, Design Changes, Time Control, Quality Control, Construction Projects.Abstrak
Design change is a common risk in construction projects and can significantly impact the efficiency of time control and work quality. This study aims to evaluate the impact of design change risk on time and quality control in a flat construction project in Samarinda. The research method used is a case study with a quantitative and qualitative descriptive approach, through interviews with the project team and analysis of project documents such as shop drawings, implementation schedules, and work progress reports. The results show that design changes that occurred in structural and architectural work caused a delay of 32 days from the initial schedule (from 365 days to 397 days). In addition, a decrease in quality efficiency was found due to revisions to working drawings and adjustments to technical specifications in the field. This impact can be minimized through the implementation of more intensive design coordination between planning consultants, supervisors, and contractors before work begins. This study emphasizes the importance of implementing design change risk management to maintain time control and quality in construction projects.Referensi
Al Tekreeti, AMA (2024). Developing a new model to control risk and improve quality in the construction industry by integrating risk management and quality function deployment. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 12(1), 101–122.https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v12.i1.24
Collins, S.P., Storrow, A., Liu, D., Jenkins, C.A., Miller, K.F., Kampe, C., & Butler, J. (2021). What's Up With: Risk Management. 1(1), 167–186.
Hanna, A.S., Russell, J.S., Nordheim, E.V., & Bruggink, M.J. (1999). Impact of change orders on labor efficiency for mechanical construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(3), 176–184.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:3(176)
Hu, Z., & Chong, H.-Y. (2019). A risk assessment framework for construction projects using risk matrix and fuzzy logic. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 25(3), 241–252.https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2019.8590
Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling (12th ed.). John Wiley & Sons
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Miang, G.Y. (2015). Empirical Investigation of The Average Deployment Force of Personal Fall-Arest Energy Absorbers. Journal Of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(1), 4014059.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000910
PMI (Project Management Institute). (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute, Inc.
Simanjuntak, Manlian, Manurung, Edison Hatoguan, Naibaho, Pio Ranap, Faslih, Arman, Puro, Sarjono, Wardiningsih, Sitti, & Suripto (2023). Construction Project Management. Cendikia Mulia Mandiri
Shoar, S., & Chileshe, N. (2021). Exploring the Causes of Design Changes in Building Construction Projects: An Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach. Sustainability, 13(17), 9578.https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179578
Soeharto, I. (1999). Project Management: From Conceptual to Operational. Erlangga.
11.jpg){kind=logo}
