Manuscript Types

Jurnal Syntax accepts several types of manuscript. Each type has its own purpose, length, structure, and treatment in peer review, and authors must choose the correct type at submission because it determines how the manuscript is assessed. This page defines every type the journal publishes, states the requirements that apply to all of them, and lists what the journal does not accept.

1. Requirements Common to Every Type

SCOPE

The manuscript must fall within software engineering, computer science, information systems, or information and communication technology, as set out in Focus and Scope.

FORMAT

Microsoft Word (.doc/.docx), A4, prepared with the official Jurnal Syntax template, which must be downloaded from the journal site and not reconstructed by hand.

ORIGINALITY

Not published elsewhere and not under consideration by another journal or conference. Every submission is screened with Turnitin at a maximum similarity of 25%, as set out in the Plagiarism Policy.

REFERENCING

IEEE style with bracketed numbering, managed with Mendeley. Reference counts differ by type and are stated below.

MANDATORY STATEMENTS

Author Contributions, Conflict of Interest, and Funding statements are required in every type except Editorials and formal notices.

EXTRA PAGES

Manuscripts exceeding the page limit of their type may be accepted at the discretion of the editor, and an additional charge applies as stated under Article Processing Charge.

2. Types Subject to Full Peer Review

1

Research Article — the principal type

An original, complete study reporting work not previously published: a new method, model, algorithm, architecture, or system, together with its implementation and an evaluation of it.
  • Length: maximum 10 pages, including figures, tables, and references, excluding appendices.
  • Abstract: 100–250 words, self-contained, stating aim, method, key findings, and conclusion, with 5–7 keywords.
  • Structure: Title · Authors · Abstract · Keywords · Introduction · Method · Results and Discussion · Conclusion · Author Contributions · Conflict of Interest · Funding · References. The Introduction must contain at least three paragraphs covering background, at least five related works, and the research gap with stated objectives.
  • References: minimum 20, of which at least 80% are peer-reviewed journal articles with a DOI published within the last five years.
  • Review: double-blind, at least two reviewers.
  • Required of this type: a stated research gap, a reproducible method, a quantified evaluation against a baseline or an accepted benchmark, and a discussion that compares the findings with the cited literature rather than restating them.
2

Review Article

A critical synthesis of the published literature on a defined question, producing an argued position rather than a list of summaries. Systematic reviews are particularly welcome.
  • Length: maximum 15 pages.
  • Abstract: 150–250 words stating the question, the search and selection method, the body of literature covered, and the conclusions drawn.
  • Structure: Introduction · Review Method · Results of the Synthesis · Discussion and Open Problems · Conclusion.
  • Method is mandatory. State the databases searched, the search strings, the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the period covered, and the number of records at each stage. A systematic review should follow a recognised protocol such as PRISMA and include the selection diagram.
  • References: minimum 50, predominantly from the last five years.
  • Review: double-blind, at least two reviewers.
  • Authorship note: a review is expected from authors with a publication record in the area reviewed; the editors may ask about this.
3

Short Communication / Technical Note

A concise report of a focused result that is complete and worth publishing but does not require a full article: a significant improvement to an existing method, a useful negative result, a new tool or dataset, or a preliminary finding with clear implications.
  • Length: maximum 6 pages.
  • Abstract: up to 150 words, with 3–5 keywords.
  • Structure: may be written in continuous sections without the full Introduction–Method–Results division, provided the method is reproducible.
  • References: minimum 10.
  • Review: double-blind, at least two reviewers, normally on an accelerated schedule.
4

Case Study / System Implementation Report

An account of the design, deployment, or evaluation of a system in a real organisational setting, where the contribution lies in the evidence and the lessons drawn rather than in a new technique.
  • Length: maximum 12 pages.
  • Structure: Introduction · Context and Requirements · Design and Implementation · Evaluation · Lessons Learned and Limitations · Conclusion.
  • References: minimum 20.
  • Review: double-blind, at least two reviewers.
  • Required of this type: an evaluation against stated criteria, an explicit statement of what generalises beyond the case and what does not, and written permission from the organisation where identifiable systems, data, or personnel are described. Manuscripts that only describe a system without evaluating it are returned.

3. Types Reviewed by the Editorial Board

Letter to the Editor

A short comment on, or challenge to, an article previously published in Jurnal Syntax. Maximum 1,500 words, up to 10 references, one table or figure. Assessed by the Editor in Chief with the handling editor of the original article, and published only after the original authors have been given the opportunity to reply, under the Post-Publication Discussion policy. Published with its own DOI and linked to the article concerned.

Author Reply

The response of the original authors to a Letter to the Editor. Maximum 1,500 words. Published in the same issue as the letter, so that readers see both positions together.

Commentary

An argued position on a question, method, standard, or policy within the scope of the journal, or a re-analysis of published work. Maximum 3,000 words, minimum 15 references. Peer reviewed where it re-analyses published data; otherwise assessed by the editorial board. Commentaries are often invited, but unsolicited submissions are welcome.

Book Review

A critical review of a recent book, textbook, or standard relevant to the scope of the journal, normally published within the last three years. Maximum 2,000 words. The review must state the full bibliographic details and declare any relationship between the reviewer and the author or publisher.

Editorial

Written or invited by the Editor in Chief to introduce an issue, explain a change of policy, or address a matter of concern to the field. Maximum 2,000 words. Not peer reviewed, and clearly labelled as an Editorial.

Correction and Retraction Notices

Corrigenda, errata, addenda, expressions of concern, and retraction notices, issued under the Correction and Retraction policy. Each is a separate citable item with its own DOI, is free to read, and carries no charge of any kind. Addenda are peer reviewed; the remaining notices are issued by the editors.

4. Choosing and Changing the Type

  • Select the type at submission in the OJS submission form. The type determines which reviewers are approached and which criteria are applied.
  • The editors may reclassify. Where a manuscript submitted as a Research Article is in substance a Short Communication, a Case Study, or a Review, the handling editor reclassifies it and informs the authors, who may withdraw if they do not agree. Reclassification is an editorial judgement about fit, not a criticism of quality.
  • Length is measured on the template. Page limits apply to the manuscript as laid out in the official template, with all figures, tables, and references in place.
  • Appendices and supplementary files — datasets, extended proofs, questionnaires, source code — are excluded from the page count and are published as supplementary galleys where the editors judge them useful to readers.

5. What the Journal Does Not Accept

Work already published

Manuscripts published elsewhere, under review elsewhere, or substantially overlapping an earlier article by the same authors. Extended versions of conference papers are considered only where the extension is substantial, the original is cited, and the difference is explained in a cover letter.

Coursework and reports without a contribution

Student assignments, internship reports, and project documentation submitted unchanged, with no research question, no evaluation, and no positioning against existing work.

Tutorials and descriptive system write-ups

Step-by-step installation or configuration guides, and descriptions of a system built with standard tools where nothing is measured and nothing is compared.

Promotional material

Manuscripts whose purpose is to advertise a product, service, institution, or training programme, including evaluations of a commercial product conducted by its own vendor without an independent comparison.

Out-of-scope submissions

Manuscripts outside software engineering, computer science, information systems, and information and communication technology. These are desk-rejected within a few days so that the authors can submit elsewhere without delay.

6. Summary of Limits

RESEARCH ARTICLE

10 pages · abstract 100–250 words · minimum 20 references · double-blind peer review

REVIEW ARTICLE

15 pages · abstract 150–250 words · minimum 50 references · double-blind peer review

CASE STUDY / IMPLEMENTATION REPORT

12 pages · abstract 100–250 words · minimum 20 references · double-blind peer review

SHORT COMMUNICATION / TECHNICAL NOTE

6 pages · abstract up to 150 words · minimum 10 references · double-blind peer review

COMMENTARY

3,000 words · minimum 15 references · editorial assessment, peer reviewed where it re-analyses published data

LETTER TO THE EDITOR / AUTHOR REPLY

1,500 words · up to 10 references · editorial assessment · right of reply guaranteed

BOOK REVIEW

2,000 words · editorial assessment

EDITORIAL

2,000 words · written or invited by the Editor in Chief · not peer reviewed

Unsure which type fits your manuscript? Write to the editorial office before submitting, with your title and abstract, and the editors will advise.
Editorial Office, Jurnal Syntax
Software Engineering Study Program, Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Universitas Dharmawangsa
Jl. K.L. Yos Sudarso No. 224, Medan 20115, North Sumatra, Indonesia
E-mail: admin_syntax@dharmawangsa.ac.id

Related pages: Author Guidelines · Authorship Criteria · Focus and Scope · Peer Review Process