ANALYSIS OF CONSUMER LEGAL PROTECTION AGAINST UNFAIR CLAUSES IN SMART CONTRACTS IN INDONESIA

Fredsly Hendra Sardol Girsang; Candra Robasa Sijabat; Siti Mutiah Rahmadanti

doi:10.46576/lj.v6i1.6982

ANALYSIS OF CONSUMER LEGAL PROTECTION AGAINST UNFAIR CLAUSES IN SMART CONTRACTS IN INDONESIA

Fredsly Hendra Sardol Girsang, Candra Robasa Sijabat, Siti Mutiah Rahmadanti

Abstract

The swift advancement of blockchain technology has introduced a transformative innovation known as smart contracts, which are self-enforcing, unchangeable computer programs for agreements. While these contracts offer benefits like efficiency and openness, their inherent qualities present major hurdles for protecting consumers, especially from the risk of inequitable terms being included. This study aims to deeply investigate the strengths and weaknesses of current Indonesian law in offering legal safeguards to consumers who use smart contracts for their transactions. Utilizing a normative juridical methodology with a statutory and conceptual framework, the research reveals several key findings. First, the essential features of smart contracts, most notably their unchangeable and self-enforcing nature, are in direct opposition to the adaptable and justice-focused principles of Indonesian contract law, like the doctrine of good faith. Second, although a foundational level of protection is offered by the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata), the Consumer Protection Law (UUPK), and the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions (UU ITE), substantial legal vacuums and difficult enforcement problems persist. Third, the research pinpoints specific ways unfair clauses appear as functions within the code and confirms that applying a purposeful interpretation of current legislation can help lessen their negative effects. In conclusion, this paper asserts the pressing requirement for creating specific legal rules and bolstering institutional supervision, especially by the Financial Services Authority (OJK), to ensure that consumer rights remain protected amidst the evolution of contractual technology.

Keywords

Smart Contract, Unfair Clauses, Consumer Protection Law, Agreements, Indonesian Civil Code

Full Text:

PDF

References

Legal Documents:

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata)

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen (UUPK)

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE)

Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 27 Tahun 2024 tentang Penyelenggaraan Perdagangan Aset Keuangan Digital Termasuk Aset Kripto

Journal articles:

Wahyuni, H. A., Naili, Y. T., & Ruhtiani, M. (2023). Penggunaan smart contract pada transaksi e-commerce dalam perspektif hukum perdata di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum In Concreto, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.35960/inconcreto.v2i1.1018

Chusnida, N. L. (2023). Click-wrap agreement: Pengalihan tanggungjawab dalam melindungi konsumen. PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum, 17(2), 180–202. https://doi.org/10.33019/progresif.v17i2.4368

Silitonga, H. D., Windari, R. A., & Ardhya, S. N. (2024). Analisis keabsahan (smart contract) transaksi aset digital di platform Ethereum dalam teknologi blockchain. Jatayu: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v7i1.94160

Habibah, A. (2024). Implementasi blockchain dalam meningkatkan kepastian hukum dan penyelesaian sengketa kontrak di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 10(2), 386–395. https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v10i2.4812

Taryono, K. P. (2024). Asas iktikad baik dalam penggunaan smart contract pada jaringan blockchain dan perbandingan regulasi smart contract di Australia, Amerika Serikat dan Inggris (Skripsi, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Indonesia). Retrieved from https://dspace.uii.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/50363/20410590_BAB%20I%20DAPUS.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y

Nurcahyanto, M. (2024). Perkembangan dan isu-isu hukum utama berkaitan dengan penerapan smart contract berbasis blockchain. Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual, 1(1), 44–46. https://journal.uii.ac.id/psha/article/view/34027

Hutapea, K. W. H., & Sulistiyono, A. (2024). Keabsahan smart contract dengan teknologi blockchain menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(3), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v1i3.177

Valentina, D. D., & Suraji, S. (2024). Analisis pencantuman klausula eksonerasi dalam perjanjian e-commerce menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, 1(1), 361–369. https://doi.org/10.62383/terang.v1i1.148

Salazar V, A. R. (2021). Unconscionability, smart contracts, and blockchain technology: Are consumers really protected against power abuses in the digital economy? International Journal on Consumer Law and Practice, 9(2). https://repository.nls.ac.in/ijclp/vol9/iss1/2

Fajarianto, E. R., Zulfikar, P., & Mulyadi, E. (2022). Tinjauan yuridis penggunaan blockchain-smart contract dalam transaksi non-fungible token (NFT) pada PT. Saga Riung Investama. Pemandhu, 3(2), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.33592/jp.v3i2.2997

Dethan, J. A., & Irianto, Y. E. G. (2024). Analisis keabsahan smart contract dalam perjanjian bisnis di Indonesia. UNES Law Review, 7(1), 462–468. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v7i1.2291

Satriojati, B. (2024). Pelindungan konsumen atas perjanjian jual beli melalui smart contract dalam perdagangan elektronik melalui sosial media. Justicia Sains: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(2), 362–376. https://doi.org/10.24967/jcs.v9i2.3163

Hazilina, & Soedagoeng, G. H. (2021). Analisis kebebasan berkontrak dalam smart contract e-commerce. Tanjungpura Law Journal, 5(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.26418/tlj.v5i1.46223

Afrihani, A., & Dwijayanthi, P. T. (2024). Eksistensi smart contract dalam cryptocurrency: Perspektif hukum di Indonesia. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 12(8), 1747–1756. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2024.v12.i08.p06

Fahlevi, F. S., & Fitriana, Z. M. (2024). Keabsahan smart contract sebagai solusi praktik manipulasi kontrak di Indonesia. Kabilah: Journal of Social Community, 9(2), 243–254. https://ejournal.iainata.ac.id/index.php/kabilah/article/view/382

Saputri, F. A. (2024). Regulating the use of smart contract in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 1(2), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.61942/jhk.v1i2.84

Baso, F., Yusuf, D. U., Djaoe, A. N. M., Iswandi, I., & Ramadhany, A. (2024). The overview of smart contract: Legality and enforceability. Dialogia Iuridica, 16(1), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v16i1.10024

Azmi, M. U., Sunarmi, Azwar, T. K. D., & Sutiarnoto. (2023). Risiko hukum penggunaan smart contract pada Ethereum di Indonesia. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 2(3), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v2i3.140

Lim, W., Angkasa, S., & Wibowo, A. D. P. (2024). Smart contracts: Validitas hukum dan tantangan di masa depan Indonesia. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 8(1), 829–837. https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v8i1.6410

Suwardiyati, R., Widhiyanti, H. N., & Wicaksono, S. (2024). Sah atau tidak smart contract dalam sistem blockchain? Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v7i2.5156

Sakirman, Akib, M., & Umar, W. (2024). Kepastian hukum smart contract dalam perspektif hukum perdata. Rewang Rencang: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(10), 1–10. https://ojs.rewangrencang.com/index.php/JHLG/article/view/617

World Wide Web:

Choy, W. (2017, December 22). When smart contracts are outsmarted: The Parity wallet “freeze” and software liability in the Internet of Value. Blockchain and the Law. https://www.blockchainandthelaw.com/2017/12/when-smart-contracts-are-outsmarted-the-parity-wallet-freeze-and-software-liability-in-the-internet-of-value/

Behnke, R. (2022, November 21). How to pause a smart contract. Halborn Blog. https://www.halborn.com/blog/post/how-to-pause-a-smart-contract

CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP. (2020). Future Facing Disputes: Disputes and Smart Contracts – traditional solutions to modern problems? Retrieved from https://cms.law/content/download/434764/file/Future%20Facing%20Disputes%20-%20Disputes%20and%20Smart%20Contracts.pdf

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, Bank Indonesia, & Badan Pengawas Perdagangan Berjangka Komoditi. (2025, Januari 10). Bappebti Kemendag alihkan tugas pengaturan dan pengawasan aset keuangan digital termasuk aset kripto serta derivatif keuangan kepada OJK dan BI [Siaran pers]. https://ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/siaran-pers/Pages/Bappebti-Kemendag-Alihkan-Tugas-Aset-Keuangan-Digital-termasuk-Aset-Kripto-serta-Derivatif-Keuangan-kepada-OJK-dan-BI.aspx

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46576/lj.v6i1.6982