SEMANTIC WEB IMPLEMENTATION FOR ENHANCING BUDGET TRANSPARENCY IN YOGYAKARTA CITY GOVERNMENT: AN ONTOLOGY AND RDF-BASED FRAMEWORK

Dzul Fadli Rahman; Ramadhana Setiyawan; Herjuna Artanto

doi:10.46576/djtechno.v6i3.7448

SEMANTIC WEB IMPLEMENTATION FOR ENHANCING BUDGET TRANSPARENCY IN YOGYAKARTA CITY GOVERNMENT: AN ONTOLOGY AND RDF-BASED FRAMEWORK

Dzul Fadli Rahman, Ramadhana Setiyawan, Herjuna Artanto

Abstract

Penerapan teknologi Semantic Web dalam pengelolaan data pemerintah menjadi strategi penting untuk meningkatkan transparansi dan keterbacaan mesin terhadap data terbuka. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mentransformasikan data Anggaran Murni Kota Yogyakarta tahun 2022 dari format tabular ke dalam representasi semantik menggunakan Resource Description Framework (RDF) dan Web Ontology Language (OWL). Ontologi dikembangkan dengan mendefinisikan lima kelas utama, yaitu Anggaran, Daerah, KategoriAnggaran, KelompokAnggaran, dan JenisAnggaran, serta dilengkapi dengan object property dan data property yang menggambarkan relasi dan atribut antarentitas. Representasi RDF kemudian diuji menggunakan beberapa query SPARQL untuk mengekstraksi informasi, seperti total anggaran, surplus atau defisit, dan identifikasi entitas tanpa alokasi. Visualisasi struktur ontologi dilakukan menggunakan plugin OWLViz untuk memastikan konsistensi logis antar kelas dan properti. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model ontologi yang dikembangkan mampu merepresentasikan struktur anggaran secara terstruktur, konsisten, dan mendukung kueri semantik. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi terhadap upaya keterbukaan data pemerintah daerah dan dapat dikembangkan lebih lanjut untuk integrasi lintas wilayah serta visualisasi interaktif berbasis Web Semantik.

Keywords

Semantic Web; RDF; Ontologi; Data Anggaran; Kota Yogyakarta; SPARQL

Full Text:

PDF

References

L. F. Luna-Reyes, J. C. Bertot, and S. Mellouli, “Open Government, Open Data and Digital Government,” Gov Inf Q, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 4–5, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.09.001.

B. W. Wirtz, J. C. Weyerer, M. Becker, and W. M. Müller, “Open government data: A systematic literature review of empirical research,” Electronic Markets, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 2381–2404, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s12525-022-00582-8.

N. Petrović, P. Milić, and B. Prlinčević, “Using open government data for economic development,” The European Journal of Applied Economics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 129–141, 2022, doi: 10.5937/EJAE19-39004.

A. Quarati and R. Albertoni, “Linked Open Government Data: Still a Viable Option for Sharing and Integrating Public Data?,” Future Internet, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 99, 2024, doi: 10.3390/fi16030099.

A. R. Durmaz, A. Thomas, L. Mishra, R. N. Murthy, and T. Straub, “An ontology-based text mining dataset for extraction of process-structure-property entities,” Sci Data, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 1112, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03926-5.

M. I. Maratsi, C. Alexopoulos, and Y. Charalabidis, “On the Semantic Analysis of Open (Government) Data Portals’ Metadata Provision and Schema,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 2024, pp. 147–157. doi: 10.1145/3680127.3680130.

S. Hoseini, J. Theissen-Lipp, and C. Quix, “A survey on semantic data management as intersection of ontology-based data access, semantic modeling and data lakes,” Journal of Web Semantics, vol. 81, p. 100819, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.websem.2024.100819.

B. Ansari, M. Barati, and E. G. Martin, “Enhancing the usability and usefulness of open government data: A comprehensive review of the state of open government data visualization research,” Gov Inf Q, vol. 39, no. 1, p. 101657, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101657.

M. C. Catone, “The role of open data in digital society: The analysis of scientific trending topics through a bibliometric approach,” Frontiers in Sociology, vol. 8, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1134518.

M. Färber, F. Bartscherer, C. Menne, and A. Rettinger, “Linked data quality of DBpedia, Freebase, OpenCyc, Wikidata, and YAGO,” Semant Web, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 77–129, 2017, doi: 10.3233/SW-170275.

D. Garijo and M. Poveda-Villalón, “Best Practices for Implementing FAIR Vocabularies and Ontologies on the Web,” 2020. doi: 10.3233/SSW200034.

F. Kirstein, K. Stefanidis, B. Dittwald, S. Dutkowski, S. Urbanek, and M. Hauswirth, “Piveau: A Large-Scale Open Data Management Platform Based on Semantic Web Technologies,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2020, pp. 648–664. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-49461-2_38.

F. Cifuentes-Silva, D. Fernández-Álvarez, and J. E. Labra-Gayo, “National Budget as Linked Open Data: New Tools for Supporting the Sustainability of Public Finances,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 4551, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12114551.

I. Ponzo and E. Milazzo, “Exploring the impact of EU funding on the local governance of migrant integration: the rise of project-driven governance,” Local Government Studies, pp. 1–20, 2025, doi: 10.1080/03003930.2024.2447880.

C. Trojahn, R. Vieira, D. Schmidt, A. Pease, and G. Guizzardi, “Foundational ontologies meet ontology matching: A survey,” Semant Web, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 685–704, 2022, doi: 10.3233/SW-210447.

K. Serderidis, I. Konstantinidis, G. Meditskos, V. Peristeras, and N. Bassiliades, “d2kg: An integrated ontology for knowledge graph-based representation of government decisions and acts,” Semant Web, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1677–1699, 2024, doi: 10.3233/SW-243535.

E. Rajabi, R. Midha, and J. F. de Souza, “Constructing a knowledge graph for open government data: the case of Nova Scotia disease datasets,” J Biomed Semantics, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 4, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s13326-023-00284-w.

S. Consoli et al., “Producing Linked Data for Smart Cities: The Case of Catania,” Big Data Research, vol. 7, pp. 1–15, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.bdr.2016.10.001.

B. E. Penteado, J. C. Maldonado, and S. Isotani, “Methodologies for publishing linked open government data on the Web: A systematic mapping and a unified process model,” Semant Web, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 585–610, 2023, doi: 10.3233/SW-222896.

M. Hofer, D. Obraczka, A. Saeedi, H. Köpcke, and E. Rahm, “Construction of Knowledge Graphs: Current State and Challenges,” Information, vol. 15, no. 8, p. 509, 2024, doi: 10.3390/info15080509.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46576/djtechno.v6i3.7448