Authority and Mechanism of Execution of Money in Lieu by Public Prosecutors in the Legal System and State Finance in Indonesia

Chintia Adelaide

Abstract


Corruption crimes not only cause legal losses, but also significant economic losses to state finances. One of the legal instruments used to recover these losses is additional punishment in the form of restitution. The Public Prosecutor (JPU) has a strategic role in executing restitution based on a court decision that has permanent legal force. This research aims to analyze the authority of the Public Prosecutor in executing restitution and examine the implementation mechanism within the framework of the Non-Tax State Revenue (PNBP) system. By using the normative juridical method, this research examines applicable legal provisions such as the Criminal Procedure Code, Anti-Corruption Law, Prosecutor's Office Law, and Non-Tax State Revenue Law, and is analyzed through a legal policy and economic approach. The results of the study show that the authority of the prosecutor in the execution of restitution already has a strong legal basis, but its implementation still faces challenges such as difficulties in tracking assets, overlapping rules, and not optimal institutional synergy. The mechanism for depositing restitution as PNBP also requires system integration, transparency, and increased institutional capacity in order to make a real contribution to the recovery of state finances. This study recommends reforming execution procedures, strengthening inter-agency cooperation, and developing an information technology-based reporting system to improve the effectiveness and accountability of restitution execution in Indonesia.


Keywords


Public Prosecutor, restitution, execution, corruption crime, non-tax revenue, state finance.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baharudin, B. (2025). THE PROBLEM OF DUALISM OF CRIMINAL ACTS OF MONEY LAUNDERING ORIGIN IN CRIMINAL LAW ENFORCEMENT IN

INDONESIA. Audi Et AP: Journal of Legal Research, 4(02), 206-212.

Bahua, S. S., & Imran, S. Y. (2025). Unraveling the Dilemma of Enforcement of General Criminal Fines: A Critical Study of the Role of the Boalemo District Attorney's Office. Almufi Journal of Social and Humanities, 2(1), 40-49.

Brunner, E., Mulyadi, M., Ekaputra, M., & Ikhsan, E. (2024). Legal Analysis of the Return of State Financial Losses Through Money in Lieu in the Decision of the Corruption Court at the Medan District Court No. 41/Pid. Sus- K/2011/PN. Mdn. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 3(3), 266-282.

Edison, D., Febrian, F., & Yuningsih, H. (2021). The Authority of the State Attorney in Taking Legal Action to Restore State Financial Losses in Corruption Cases.

Errika, N. D., Andri, M., & Susilowati, T. (2025). The Role of Prosecutors in Corruption Cases Based on the Corruption Eradication Law. Justicia Journal, 14(1), 158-186.

Gultom, P. (2022). Sociological Analysis of Law on the Possibility of Implementing Restorative Justice in Corruption Crime Cases in Indonesia. Al-Hikmah Journal of Law and Society, 3(1).

Gregorius, J. B. (2025). Anthropological-Juridical Contestation on the Execution of Additional Punishment in the form of Fulfillment of Local Customary Obligations According to Criminal Code Number: 1 Year 2023. Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 7(4), 2458-2473.

Hartika, L., Dithisari, I., & Andriati, S. L. (2022). The Urgency of the Execution of Additional Penalty for Money in Lieu by the Prosecutor in Corruption Cases. Binamulia Hukum, 11(2), 127-137.

Hidayat, N., & Sulastri, S. (2021). Auction and Direct Sale of Confiscated Objects in Criminal Cases. Yustitia Journal, 22(1).

Leksono, S. C., Naholo, V. V., Rustianti, F., Simamora, B., & Purnomo, H. (2025). The Politics of Law and Corruption: A Critical Study of Law Number 1 Year 2023 on the Criminal Code. Cendekia: Journal of Law, Social and Humanities, 3(2), 1071-1084.

MARGONO, R., SH, M., ARIEF, M. I., & SH, M. (2024). Reformulation of Additional Penalty for Money in Lieu of Corruption Cases. MCL Publisher.

Mosal, E. D. (2023). PROCEDURES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AUCTION OF CONFISCATED GOODS AFTER A JUDGE'S DECISION THAT HAS PERMANENT LEGAL FORCE. LEX PRIVATUM, 11(1).

Mustofa, W. (2025, January). The Role of Prosecutors in the Execution of Payment in Lieu of Money in Corruption Cases at the Kuantan Singingi District Attorney's Office. In Semnashum: National Seminar on Law (Vol. 2, No. 02).

Putri, D. D. P. (2024). THE APPLICATION OF ASSET FORFEITURE AS AN ADDITIONAL PUNISHMENT IN THE ERADICATION OF CORRUPTION

IN INDONESIA. Samudra Keadilan Law Journal, 19(2), 302-319.

Ramandey, T. E. L., Malik, F., & Rumkel, N. (2020). THE APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 18 OF LAW NUMBER 20 OF 2001 RELATED TO RESTITUTION TO RECOVER STATE FINANCIAL LOSSES. The Juris, 4(2), 61-76.

Sari, T. N., Sudarti, E., & Monita, Y. (2021). Execution of Court Decisions by Prosecutors Against Criminal Payment of Restitution in Corruption Crimes at the Muaro Jambi District Attorney's Office. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 2(2), 54-67.

Saputro, H. J., & Chandra, T. Y. (2021). The Urgency of Recovering State Financial Losses Through Blocking and Asset Forfeiture Actions as a Corruption Law Enforcement Strategy. Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law, 5(2), 273-290.

Sihombing, D. C., Syahrin, A., Ablisar, M., & Mulyadi, M. (2023). Strengthening the Authority of Prosecutors as Dominus Litis as an Effort to Optimize Restorative Justice-Oriented Criminal Law Enforcement. Locus: Journal of Legal Science Concepts, 3(2), 63-75.

Sofian, A. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Volume 6 Number 2, Year 2025 (ISSN 2721-8325).

Tarta, A. F., & Widyastuti, E. (2022). IMPLEMENTATION OF RESTITUTION IN CORRUPTION CRIMES IN THE KENDARI DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S

OFFICE. Lakidende Law Review, 1(3), 299-312

Vitria, Y. (2024). The Burden of Proof and Sanctions in the Crime of Corruption in Review of Law Number 31 Year 1999 Juncto Law Number 20 Year 2001 on the Crime of Corruption. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 4(3), 5918-5936.

Yadi, I., Sudarti, E., Liyus, H., Hartati, H., Ramadani, A. A., & Raharja, I. F. (2024). THE AUTHORITY OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR IN CONFISCATING THE PROCEEDS OF CORRUPTION IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF

LEGISLATION. Suloh: Journal of the Faculty of Law, Malikussaleh University, 12(1), 90-105.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46576/ijsseh.v6i2.7169

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF – 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Chintia Adelaide

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Dharmawangsa International Journal Indexed by:

   

  

Member Of :

Dharmawangsa: International Journal of the Social Sciences, Education and Humanitis Published By: 

UNIVERSITAS DHARMAWANGSA

Alamat : Jl. K. L. Yos Sudarso No. 224 Medan
Kontak : Tel. 061 6635682 - 6613783  Fax. 061 6615190
Email : dharmawangsajournal@dharmawangsa.ac.id

 

 

Dharmawangsa:International Journal of the Social Sciences, Education and Humanitis by Universitas Dharmawangsa Medan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Based on a work at: https://jurnal.dharmawangsa.ac.id/index.php/dharmawangsa/index