The Trend Of Corruption The Medan District Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46576/lpj.v4i2.8664Kata Kunci:
Corruption, Case Trends, Defendant Education, Medan Corruption CourtAbstrak
This study aims to analyze trends in corruption cases and the characteristics of defendants based on the level of education in the Corruption Court at the Medan District Court Class 1A specifically in the period 2020-2024. The method used is a quantitative descriptive approach by utilizing secondary data in the form of case decisions obtained from The Case Tracking Information System (SIPP). The results showed that the trend of corruption cases has increased significantly over the past five years, with a total of 596 cases and 611 defendants. From a demographic aspect, the majority of defendants are men, while women are relatively fewer. Based on the level of education, most of the defendants have a higher education background, especially Bachelor (S1), followed by master (S2) and doctorate (S3). These findings indicate that corruption is not directly influenced by the level of education, but rather related to internal factors such as greed and abuse of power. Therefore, efforts to eradicate corruption not only require a repressive approach through law enforcement, but also a preventive approach through anti-corruption education and strengthening moral integrity.
Referensi
Arief, B. N. (1998). Beberapa aspek kebijakan penegakan dan pengembangan hukum pidana. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Atmasasmita, R. (2004). Sekitar Masalah Korupsi: Aspek nasional dan aspek internasional. Mandar maju.
Dewi, P. M. Achmad Ali.(2009). Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) Dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence). Kencana. Afrizal Mukti Wibowo, Putri Maha Dewi, dkk.(2024). Perkembangan Hukum Keperdataan di Era Digital. PT. Sada Kurnia Pustaka. Ahzar, Rizki M.(2022). Keadilan Restorative Justice Sebagai Upaya. Hukum ACARA PERDATA, 3(1), 169.
Hart, H. L. A. (2017). Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals. In Law and Morality (pp. 63-99). Routledge.
http://sipp.pn-medankota.go.id/index.php/detil_perkara
Jaya, N. S. P., & Nyoman, T. P. K. (2005). Kolusi dan Nepotisme di Indonesia. Badan Penerbit Undip, Semarang.
Nasution, B. D. (2004). Perilaku Hukum dan Moral di Indonesia. Kumpulan Tulisan 70 Tahun Prof. Muhamamad Abduh. SH.
Royani, I. (2024). Independensi Kewenangan Jaksa Dalam Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(2), 177-186.
Sarwoko, D. (2017). Politik Hukum Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pendanaan Terorisme Di Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Gadjah Mada).
Sitompul, A. (2022). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Strategi Praktis Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi).
Sitompul, A. (2023). Kebijakan Kriminal Dalam Sistem Peradilan Serta Penanggulangan Kejahatan di Indonesia.
Suseno, S., & Putri, N. S. (Eds.). (2013). Hukum pidana Indonesia: perkembangan dan pembaharuan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Unduhan
File Tambahan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The spirit of Legal Preneur (JLPR) is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, JLPR permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and JLPR on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. JLPR will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. JLPR will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that JLPR entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
JLPR will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. JLJ's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
