The Role Of The Prosecutor's Office And The BPK In The Process Of Returning State Losses Between Dominus Litis And Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46576/lpj.v4i2.8645Kata Kunci:
Audit Board, Dominus Litis, Attorney General, Justice, State LossesAbstrak
This study examines the role of the prosecutor's office and the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) in the process of returning state losses due to corruption, especially in relation to the dominus litis principle and the dimension of Justice. The method used is juridical normative approach to legislation and conceptual through the study of literature (library research). The results showed that the relationship of authority between the prosecutor's office and the BPK is complementary but has not been coordinated systematically, resulting in normative gaps that weaken the effectiveness of state asset recovery. The dominus litis principle that gives prosecutorial authority to prosecutors is in practice limited by the principle of functional differentiation that separates investigation and prosecution. The restorative justice approach and the establishment of an Asset Recovery Agency is a positive institutional breakthrough, but requires strengthening interagency coordination regulations so that the goal of returning state losses can be optimally achieved. This study concludes the need for special regulations that regulate formal coordination between the prosecutor's office and the BPK as the foundation for fair and measurable recovery of State losses.
Referensi
Ahmad Sofian, “Penguatan Kapasitas Jaksa Melalui Koordinasi dalam Proses Penyidikan dan Penuntutan dalam RUU KUHAP: Studi Perbandingan AS, Belanda dan Indonesia,” PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law 6, no. 2 (2025): 183–217, https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Pampas/article/view/42540.
Aulia, Muhammad Nur, dan Sulaiman, “Termination Of Investigation Of Corruption Offences By The Prosecutor’s Office Against The Return Of State Financial Losses,” Jurnal Suloh: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh 13, no. 1 (2025): 41–66, https://doi.org/10.29103/sjp.v13i1.19122.
Aulia, Nur, dan Sulaiman, “Termination Of Investigation Of Corruption Offences By The Prosecutor’s Office Against The Return Of State Financial Losses.”
Erlangga, Mulyono, dan Fauziah, “Efektifitas Peran Kejaksaan Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Perkara Korupsi Melalui Pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan.”
Fajri Kurniawan, Muhammad Syammakh Daffa Alghazali, dan Afdhal Fadhila, “Determinasi Upaya Pemulihan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Melalui Peran Kejaksaan terhadap Perampasan Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 3, no. 7 (2022): 565–88, https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v3i7.279.
Gabriel Kalalo dan Arman Tjoneng, “Peran Komisi Kejaksaan Dalam Mengawasi Kinerja Kejaksaan Sebagai Pelaksana Asas Dominus Litis Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Korupsi,” Unes Law Review 6, no. 4 (2024): 9935, https://review-unes.com/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Helmy Febrianto Rasyda, Tofik Yanuar Chandra, dan Mohamad Ismed, “Kewenangan Jaksa Penuntut Umum dalam Penyelesaian Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah 2, no. 8 (2025): 305–16, https://doi.org/10.62335/cendekia.v3i2.2417.
Kalalo dan Tjoneng, “Peran Komisi Kejaksaan Dalam Mengawasi Kinerja Kejaksaan Sebagai Pelaksana Asas Dominus Litis Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Korupsi.” Lihat juga Sitompul, A. (2024). The Role Of The State In Conducting Civil Suits In The Results Of Corruption Controlled By The Heirs Of The Perpetrators Of Corruption. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum, 23(002), 1614-1623.
Mahmud Marzuki, “Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi,” in Prenada Media (Prenada Media, 2021), hal 270, https://books.google.co.id/books?id=CKZADwAAQBAJ.
Maswandi, A. S. (2024). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Mekanisme Dalam Penulisan Ilmiah), Mazda Media, Malang.
Muhammad Hasan Pakaja, Ronald J. Mawuntu, dan Caecilia J. J. Waha, “Implementasi Peran Jaksa Pengacara Negara Yang Profesional, Proporsional Dan Akuntabel Dalam Pemulihan Kerugian Negara,” Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research 5, no. 4 (2025): hlm. 3880-3895, https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v5i4.20513.
Nursyamsudin Nursyamsudin dan Samud Samud, “Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu (Integreted Criminal Justice System) Menurut Kuhap,” Mahkamah : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (2022): 149, https://doi.org/10.24235/mahkamah.v7i1.10413.
Pakaja, Mawuntu, dan Waha, “Implementasi Peran Jaksa Pengacara Negara Yang Profesional, Proporsional Dan Akuntabel Dalam Pemulihan Kerugian Negara.”
Pakaja, Mawuntu, dan Waha, “Implementasi Peran Jaksa Pengacara Negara Yang Profesional, Proporsional Dan Akuntabel Dalam Pemulihan Kerugian Negara.”
Puteri Kencana Surya Erlangga, Mulyono, dan Fauziah, “Efektifitas Peran Kejaksaan Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Perkara Korupsi Melalui Pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan,” Jurisdictie 5, no. 2 (2023): 137–56, https://doi.org/10.34005/jhj.v5i2.132.
Ridwan Arifin, Sigit Riyanto, dan Akbar Kurnia Putra, “Collaborative Efforts in ASEAN for Global Asset Recovery Frameworks to Combat Corruption in the Digital Era,” Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 31, no. 2 (2023): 329–43, https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i2.29381.
Rizki Rahayu Fitri dan Agnes Fitryantica, “Transformasi Konstitusional Pertanggungjawaban Presiden Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945,” Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia 2, no. 2 (2025): 105–15, https://journal.uii.ac.id/psha/article/view/44964.
Salsabila dan Tri Slamet Wahyudi, “Peran Kejaksaan Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menggunakan Pendekatan Restorative Justice,” Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum 51, no. 1 (2022): 61–70, https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.1.2022.61-70.
Sitompul, A. (2022). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Strategi Praktis Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi)
Sitompul, A. (2025). The Dynamics of Corruption in Indonesia Between Prevention and Eradication. LEMKAPI: Journal of Law & Policy Studies, 1(1), 22–29. Retrieved from https://lemkapi.com/index.php/lkp/article/view/7
Sitompul, A. (2026). Legal Analysis of Savings and Loan Cooperatives with Money Laundering with the Origin of Fraud Together and Continues in Decision No. 2113 K / Pid.Sus/2023. International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML), 5(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v5i1.158
Sitompul, A., & Sipayung, I. M. (2025). The Development of the Death Penalty for Corruption Committed by Judges in Indonesia. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 17(02), 95-109.
Sitompul, M. N. ., & Sitompul, A. . (2023). Application of money laundering in corruption cases in maintaining state stability. The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research, 11(1), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.35335/ijopsor.v11i1.121
Sitorus, N. T., & Sitompul, A. (2025). Maswandi Criminal Liability For Corruption By Public Officials: Analysis Of Decision No. 141/Pid. Sus-TPK/2024/PN Mdn: Criminal Liability For Corruption By Public Officials: Analysis Of Decision No. 141/Pid. Sus-TPK/2024/PN Mdn. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum, 24(1), 4416-4423.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia, “Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia,” CWL Publishing Enterprises, Inc., Madison, 2004, 352, https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/40511/uu-no-16-tahun-2004.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia, “Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” 1999, 475.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia, “Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” 1999, 475.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia, “Undang-undang (UU) No. 15 Tahun 2006 Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan,” 2006, https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/40184/uu-no-15-tahun-2006.
Undang-Undang, “Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” 1999, 1–20.
Unduhan
File Tambahan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The spirit of Legal Preneur (JLPR) is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, JLPR permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and JLPR on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. JLPR will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. JLPR will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that JLPR entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
JLPR will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. JLJ's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
