Prevention Of Polyandry In The Perspective Of Islamic Law And Law No. 1 Year 2023

Maswandi Maswandi

doi:10.46576/lpj.v4i2.8643

Prevention Of Polyandry In The Perspective Of Islamic Law And Law No. 1 Year 2023

Maswandi Maswandi

Abstract

Marriage as a normatively protected and religious institution in Indonesia still faces the threat of polyandry practices that are contrary to moral values, religion, and applicable legal regulations. This study aims to examine the Prohibition of polyandry from the point of view of Islamic law and the construction of criminal sanctions in Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code, as well as formulating an integrative prevention model. The method used is normative juridical approach through the study of literature with descriptive-analytical analysis. The results showed that all schools of jurisprudence have agreed by ijma ' ban polyandry because it is contrary to maqashid al-Sharia, especially the principle of hifzh Al-nasl and hifzh al-'irdh. Indonesia's positive law also prohibits the practice through the principle of monogamy and the provision of double marriage. The meeting point between the two legal systems is an important foundation in building a comprehensive prevention mechanism. The Integrative prevention Model includes institutional synergies between KUA, MUI, and law enforcement officials, strengthening premarital education, and digitizing national marriage records in order to realize equitable family resilience.

Keywords

Polyandry, Islamic law, Maqashid Al-Sharia, criminal code 2023, Prevention of criminal acts

Full Text:

PDF

References

“Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan,” Notes and Queries s2-IX, no. 215 (1974): 112, https://doi.org/10.1093/nq/s2-ix.215.112a.

“Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana,” No. 1 (2023): 1–261.

“Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun T974 Tentang Perkawinan,” Jurnalmahasiswa.Unesa.Ac.Id 1, no. 1 (2021): 764–78, https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-pendidikan kewarganegaraa/article/view/35779%0Ahttps://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/id/eprint/20163/%0Ahttps://e-journal.uingusdur.ac.id/al-hukkam/article/view/587%0Ahttp://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/f.

Achmad Hasan Alfarisi, “Kontribusi Hukum Islam Dalam Bidang Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia” 02, no. 03 (2025): 1038–45.

Agustin Hanapi, “Resolution Of Polyandry Cases Through Customary Law (A Case Study In Darussalam District, Aceh Besar Regency)” 1, no. 2 (2024): 123–41.

Ahmad Muhammad et al., “Poliandri Dalam Perspektif Pancasila Dan Hukum Islam : Kajian Konstitusional Dan Nilai-Nilai Kebangsaan Polyandry in the Perspective of Pancasila and Islamic Law : Constitutional Studies and National Values” 1, no. 2 (2024): 207–19

Daniel Indriadi, Vivian Nadienna, and Vidya Utami Naya, “Perbedaan Hukumantara Poligami Dan Poliandri Bedasarkan Konsep Keadil

Diana Zuhroh, “Husband-Wife Relations in Polyandry Households : Empirical Study of Polyandry in Plosorejo Village , Kismantoro District Wonogiri” 5 (2025).

Lu’luul Maknun, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Istri Yang Menjadi Korban Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Oleh Suami Diwilayah Hukum Kepolisian Resor Kota Jambi” (Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 2025).

Maswandi, “Community Views On Polygamy And Polyandry Islamic Legal Perspective” 2, no. 4 (2023): 163–68.

Otong Rosadi and Susi Delmiati, “Perbedaan Hukumantara Poligami Dan Poliandri Bedasarkan Konsep Keadilan Dalam Islam” 3, no. 2 (2024): 57–65.

Rya Elita, “Analisis Tindak Pidana Perzinaan Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Dan Qanun Jinayat Di Aceh,” 2026, 62–68.

Sitompul, A. (2022). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Strategi Praktis Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi).

Universitas Brawijaya, “Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Kawin Mut’ah (Kawin Kontrak) Dari Perspektif Hukum Islam Criminal Punishment Of Mut’ah (Contract) Marriage Perpetrators From The Perspective Of Islamic Law” 6, no. 6 (2025): 1–35.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46576/lpj.v4i2.8643