THE ANALYSIS OF BIBLIOSHINY FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF RESEARCH ON COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE

Erick Ivan Gian; Danang Nugroho; Muhammad Refki Novesar; Ni Nyoman Yulianthini; Ida Bagus Made Widiadnya; Putri Dwi Novrina

doi:10.46576/wdw.v17i4.3804

THE ANALYSIS OF BIBLIOSHINY FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF RESEARCH ON COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE

Erick Ivan Gian, Danang Nugroho, Muhammad Refki Novesar, Ni Nyoman Yulianthini, Ida Bagus Made Widiadnya, Putri Dwi Novrina

Abstract

The investigation of collaborative governance involving government and non-government entities presents an intriguing area of study due to the existing research gap in the field of disaster management pertaining to the partnership between these two sectors. The objective of this study is to contribute insights that can inform the future direction of research on collaborative governance.Â The researcher conducted an investigation on the utilization of R Studio (specifically, Biblioshiny) and performed a comprehensive assessment of scientific literature pertaining to collaborative governance. This investigation involved the analysis and visualization of data from 135 examples across multiple sectors. Following a comprehensive review, the researcher has successfully identified significant variables that possess the potential to exert influence on collaborative governance. This identification was achieved through the utilization of data analysis and visualization techniques applied to a corpus of 135 documents authored by 377 scientists, which were sourced from 89 reputable journals published within the timeframe spanning from 2009 to 2023. It is worth noting that research pertaining to this subject matter has experienced a surge in interest since 2002, and this trend has persisted with an annual growth rate of 12.18%. The biblioshiny mapping results provide an overview of five prominent research themes in the field of collaborative governance management. These themes are identified based on the minimum five-word frequency and word count per year. The subjects encompassed in this discourse consist of governance approach models, climate change, decision-making processes, collaborative governance, and stakeholders. In recent years, esteemed academic publications such as the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, together with Public Administration Review, have played a pivotal role in promoting and fostering research on Collaborative Governance. The outcomes of this research can aid academics in providing a comprehensive analysis of the existing body of literature on Collaborative Management.

Keyword : collaborative governance, bibliometric analysis, Biblioshiny

Full Text:

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., Tencati, A., Midttun, A., & Perrini, F. (2008). The changing role of governments in corporate social responsibility: drivers and responses. Business Ethics: A European Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2008.00539.x

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Aoki, N. (2015). Wide-area collaboration in the aftermath of the March 11 disasters in Japan: Implications for responsible disaster management. International Review of Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314541563

Becker, P. (2021). Tightly coupled policies and loosely coupled networks in the governing of flood risk mitigation in municipal administrations. Ecology and Society. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12441-260234

Berardo, R., Fischer, M., & Hamilton, M. (2020). Collaborative Governance and the Challenges of Network-Based Research. American Review of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020927792

Berkes, F., & Ross, H. (2013). Community Resilience: Toward an Integrated Approach. Society and Natural Resources. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2012.736605

Bianchi, C., Nasi, G., & Rivenbark, W. C. (2021). Implementing collaborative governance: models, experiences, and challenges. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1878777

Bifulco, L., Centemeri, L., & Mozzana, C. (2021). Editorsâ€™ Note. Introduction to the Symposium on â€œPreparedness in an Uncertain and Risky World.â€ In Sociologica. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/14168

BlÃ¼hdorn, I., & Deflorian, M. (2019). The collaborative management of sustained unsustainability: On the performance of participatory forms of environmental governance. Sustainability (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11041189

Blythe, J. L., Cohen, P. J., Eriksson, H., & Harohau, D. (2022). Do governance networks build collaborative capacity for sustainable development? Insights from Solomon Islands. Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01644-5

Bodin, Ã–., Nohrstedt, D., & Orach, K. (2022). A diagnostic for evaluating collaborative responses to compound emergencies. Progress in Disaster Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2022.100251

Bodin, Ã–., SandstrÃ¶m, A., & Crona, B. (2017). Collaborative Networks for Effective Ecosystem-Based Management: A Set of Working Hypotheses. Policy Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12146

Borgonovi, E., Bianchi, C., & Rivenbark, W. C. (2019). â€œPursuing Community Resilience through Outcome-Based Public Policies: Challenges and Opportunities for the Design of Performance Management Systems.â€ Public Organization Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-017-0395-1

Brookes, B. C. (1977). Theory of the bradford law. In Journal of Documentation. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026641

Eriksson, E., Andersson, T., HellstrÃ¶m, A., Gadolin, C., & Lifvergren, S. (2020). Collaborative public management: coordinated value propositions among public service organizations. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1604793

Fransen, L. W., & Kolk, A. (2007). Global rule-setting for business: A critical analysis of multi-stakeholder standards. Organization. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407080305

Garfield, E., & Sher, I. H. (1963). New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140304

Gerlak, A. K., & Heikkila, T. (2011). Building a theory of learning in collaboratives: Evidence from the everglades restoration program. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq089

Gilbert, D. U., Rasche, A., & Waddock, S. (2011). Accountability in a Global Economy: The Emergence of International Accountability Standards. Business Ethics Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20112112

Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management. Administration and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601

Hermansson, H. (2019). Challenges to Decentralization of Disaster Management in Turkey: The Role of Political-Administrative Context. International Journal of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1466898

Osborne, S. P. (2010). Delivering public services: Time for a new theory? In Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030903495232

Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A New Theory for Public Service Management? Toward a (Public) Service-Dominant Approach. American Review of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012466935

Ozdemir, S., & Finkelstein, E. A. (2018). Cognitive Bias: The Downside of Shared Decision Making. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1200/cci.18.00011

Parker, C. F., Nohrstedt, D., Baird, J., Hermansson, H., Rubin, O., & Baekkeskov, E. (2020). Collaborative crisis management: a plausibility probe of core assumptions. Policy and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1767337

Pollitt, C. (2016). Debate: Climate changeâ€”the ultimate wicked issue. Public Money and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2016.1118925

Russo Carroll, S., Hudson, M., Chapman, J., Figueroa-RodrÃguez, O. L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., Parsons, M., Raseroka, K., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., Rowe, R., Sara, R., & Walker, J. (2018). CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. Indigenous Data Sovereignty Principles for the Governance of Indigenous Data Workshop;

Scott, T. A., & Thomas, C. W. (2017). Unpacking the Collaborative Toolbox: Why and When Do Public Managers Choose Collaborative Governance Strategies? Policy Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12162

Torfing, J., & Ansell, C. (2017). Strengthening political leadership and policy innovation through the expansion of collaborative forms of governance. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1200662

Wamsler, C. (2004). Managing Urban Risk: Perceptions of Housing and Planning as a Tool for Reducing Disaster Risk. Global Built Enviroment Review.

Zadek, S. (2008). Global collaborative governance: There is no alternative. Corporate Governance. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700810899121

Zadek, S., & Radovich, S. (2008). Collaborative governance: The new multilaterism for the 21st century. In Global Development 2.0.

Zhang, X., & Yu, B. (2022). Causality Analysis and Risk Assessment of Haze Disaster in Beijing. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12189291

Zupic, I., & ÄŒater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v17i4.3804