PENERIMAAN TEKNOLOGI KECERDASAN BUATAN DALAM KOMUNIKASI BERBASIS UTAUT2 PADA PELAJAR

Tiara Nisa Aryanto; Irwansyah Irwansyah

doi:10.46576/jnm.v8i2.6167

PENERIMAAN TEKNOLOGI KECERDASAN BUATAN DALAM KOMUNIKASI BERBASIS UTAUT2 PADA PELAJAR

Tiara Nisa Aryanto, Irwansyah Irwansyah

Abstract

Artikel ini memaparkan tentang penerimaan para pelajar terhadap teknologi kecerdasan buatan dalam komunikasi, dengan menggunakan UTAUT-2. Studi ini menggunakan pendekatan Systematic Literature Review (SLR) dengan mengkaji beberapa makalah jurnal yang telah terinklusi. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui penerimaan, penggunaan, serta tantangan teknologi komunikasi AI pada pelajar dan menawarkan solusinya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ekspektasi kinerja, motivasi hedonis, pengaruh sosial, dan kondisi yang memfasilitasi mendorong penerimaan AI dalam komunikasi pelajar. AI berperan sebagai alat komunikasi yang efisien dalam lingkungan belajar yang adaptif dan interaktif. Namun, tantangan seperti privasi, kurangnya pengetahuan teknologi, dan etika akademik masih menjadi kendala. Oleh karena itu, kebijakan pendidikan harus mendukung penggunaan AI secara etis dan efektif melalui literasi digital, pelatihan teknis, dan pengawasan. Temuan penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan wawasan bagi institusi pendidikan, penyedia teknologi, dan pembuat kebijakan dalam meningkatkan penerimaan AI serta memaksimalkan manfaatnya dalam pembelajaran.

Keywords

Kecerdasan Buatan; UTAUT2; Penerimaan; Pelajar; Tinjauan Pustaka Sistematis

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abbas, N., Whitfield, J., Atwell, E., Bowman, H., Pickard, T., & Walker, A. (2022). Online chat and chatbots to enhance mature student engagement in higher education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 41(3), 308–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2022.2066213

Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Ballesteros, M. A. A., Jordan, O. H., Roca, C. L., & Tirado, K. S. (2024). Analysis of college students’ attitudes toward the use of ChatGPT in their academic activities: effect of intent to use, verification of information and responsible use. BMC Psychology, 12, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01764-z

Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Ballesteros, M. A., Perez, C. R. V., Jordan, O. H., Vergara, J. A. M., Acosta, R. M., Vargas, C. G. A. P., & Castillo, J. C. A. (2025). AI in academia: How do social influence, self-efficacy, and integrity influence researchers’ use of AI models? Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 11, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101274

Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Farronan, E. V. ´ R., Zapata, L. I. V., Garcia, F. S. M., Rabanal-Leon, H., Catalina, Angaspilco, J. E. M., & Bocanegra, J. C. S. (2024). Acceptance of artificial intelligence in university contexts: A conceptual analysis based on UTAUT2 theory. Heliyon, 10(19), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38315

Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Valle, M. de los Á. G., Ballesteros, M. A., Castillo, J. C. A., Vargas, C. G. A. P., Torres, I. S., León, P. M. S., & Tirado, K. S. (2025). What is the influence of psychosocial factors on artificial intelligence appropriation in college students? BMC Psychology, 13(7), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02328-x

Agar, J. (2020). What is technology? Annals of Science, 77(3), 377–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2019.1672788

Alhwaiti, M. (2023). Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Application in the Post-Covid Era and Its Impact on Faculty Members’ Occupational Well-being and Teaching Self Efficacy: A Path Analysis Using the UTAUT 2 Model. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2023.2175110

Almahri, F. A. A. jid, Bell, D., & Gulzar, Z. (2024). Chatbot Technology Use and Acceptance Using Educational Personas. Informatics, 11(38), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics11020038

Alzahrani, A., & Alzahrani, A. (2025). Understanding ChatGPT adoption in universities: the impact of faculty TPACK and UTAUT2. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educacion a Distancia, 28(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.5944/RIED.28.1.41498

Antony, S., & Ramnath, R. (2023). A Phenomenological Exploration of Students’ Perceptions of AI Chatbots in Higher Education. IAFOR Journal of Education, 11(2), 7–38. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.11.2.01

Ayanwale, M. A., Ntshangase, S. D., Adelana, O. P., Afolabi, K. W., Adam, U. A., & Olatunbosun, S. O. (2024). Navigating the future: Exploring in-service teachers’ preparedness for artificial intelligence integration into South African schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100330

Bahadur, S. G. C., Bhandari, P., Gurung, S. K., Srivastava, E., Ojha, D., & Dhungana, B. R. (2024). Examining the role of social influence, learning value and habit on students’ intention to use ChatGPT: the moderating effect of information accuracy in the UTAUT2 model. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2403287

Ballesteros, M. A. A., Enríquez, B. G. A., Farroñán, E. V. R., Juárez, H. D. G., Salinas, L. E. C., Sánchez, J. E. B., Castillo, J. C. A., Licapa-Redolfo, G. S., & Chilicaus, G. C. F. (2024). The Sustainable Integration of AI in Higher Education: Analyzing ChatGPT Acceptance Factors Through an Extended UTAUT2 Framework in Peruvian Universities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310707

Biloš, A., & Budimir, B. (2024). Understanding the Adoption Dynamics of ChatGPT among Generation Z: Insights from a Modified UTAUT2 Model. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 19, 863–879. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19020045

Bogoslovskaya, Z. M., Novikova, V. S., & Itcenko, A. V. (2015). The Name of the Concept STUDENT in Russian and English Languages: On Lexicographical Material. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 215(December 2015), 301–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.653

Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2005). Model of Adoption of Technology in Households: A Baseline Model Test and Extension Incorporating Household Life Cycle. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 399–426. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25148690

Cabero-Almenara, J., Palacios-Rodríguez, A., Loaiza-Aguirre, M. I., & Andrade-Abarca, P. S. (2024). The impact of pedagogical beliefs on the adoption of generative AI in higher education: predictive model from UTAUT2. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1497705

Clarizia, F., Colace, F., Lombardi, M., Pascale, F., & Santaniello, D. (2018). Chatbot: An education support system for student. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Vol. 11161 LNCS. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01689-0_23

Cortez, P. M., Ong, A. K. S., Diaz, J. F. T., German, J. D., & Jagdeep, S. J. S. S. (2024). Analyzing Preceding factors affecting behavioral intention on communicational artificial intelligence as an educational tool. Heliyon, 10, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25896

Cunningham-nelson, S., Boles, W., Trouton, L., & Margerison, E. (2019). A Review of Chatbots in Education: Practical Steps Forward. Proceedings of the AAEE2019 Conference Brisbane, Australia, 1–8. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/134323/

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Durak, H. Y., & Onan, A. (2024). Predicting the use of chatbot systems in education: a comparative approach using PLS-SEM and machine learning algorithms. Current Psychology, 43, 23656–23674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06072-8

Grassini, S., Aasen, M. L., & Møgelvang, A. (2024). Understanding University Students’ Acceptance of ChatGPT: Insights from the UTAUT2 Model. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2024.2371168

Habibi, A., Muhaimin, M., Danibao, B. K., Wibowo, Y. G., Wahyuni, S., & Octavia, A. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education learning: Acceptance and use. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100190

Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., Wahyuni, S., Danibao, B. K., & Wibowo, Y. G. (2024). ChatGPT acceptance and use through UTAUT and TPB: A big survey in five Indonesian Universities. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 10, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101136

Hancock, J. T., Naaman, M., & Levy, K. (2020). AI-Mediated Communication: Definition, Research Agenda, and Ethical Considerations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz022

Herschbach, D. R. (1995). Technology as Knowledge: Implications for Instruction. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 31–42.

Jacucci, G., Spagnolli, A., Freeman, J., & Gamberini, L. (2014). Symbiotic Interaction: A Critical Definition and Comparison to other Human-Computer Paradigms. In G. Jacucci, L. Gamberini, J. Freeman, & A. Spagnolli (Eds.), Symbiotic Interaction 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 3–20). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13500-7_1

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. EBSE Technical Report.

Lavidas, K., Voulgari, I., Papadakis, S., Athanassopoulos, S., Anastasiou, A., Filippidi, A., Komis, V., & Karacapilidis, N. (2024). Determinants of Humanities and Social Sciences Students’ Intentions to Use Artificial Intelligence Applications for Academic Purposes. Information (Switzerland), 15, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15060314

Li, L., Lee, K. Y., Emokpae, E., & Yang, S. B. (2021). What makes you continuously use chatbot services? Evidence from chinese online travel agencies. Electronic Markets, 31(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00454-z

Li, Q., & Qin, Y. (2023). AI in medical education: medical student perception, curriculum recommendations and design suggestions. BMC Medical Education, 23, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04700-8

Lubis, C. U., Ichsanda, B., & Hz, R. (2024). Perplexity AI on the Writing Efficiency of EFL Students in Higher Education: Students’ Insights. ENGLISH FRANCA : Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 8(1), 167–178. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/ef.v8i1%20May.9982

Mardiana, Ugi, N., & Budi, S. I. (2022). Motivasi Siswa Mengikuti Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani di SMP 13 Tanjung Jabung Timur. Jurnal Score, 2(1), 32–37.

McCarthy, J. (2007). WHAT IS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE? In Computer Science Department. Stanford University. http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/

McLuhan, M. (2013). UNDERSTANDING MEDIA: THE EXTENSIONS OF MAN. GINGKO PRESS.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). Josey-Bass.

Okonkwo, C. W., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2021a). Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100033

Okonkwo, C. W., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2021b). Python-bot: A chatbot for teaching python programming. Engineering Letters, 29(1), 25–34.

Ortega-Rodríguez, P. J., & Pericacho-Gómez, F. J. (2025). The perceived educational usefulness of ChatGPT among university students. Pixel-Bit, Revista de Medios y Educacion, 72, 159–178. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.109778

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Palau-Saumell, R., Forgas-Coll, S., Sánchez-García, J., & Robres, E. (2019). User acceptance of mobile apps for restaurants: An expanded and extended UTAUT-2. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041210

Pérez, J. Q., Daradoumis, T., & Puig, J. M. M. (2020). Rediscovering the use of chatbots in education: A systematic literature review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(6), 1549–1565. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22326

Putra, F. P., & Widyana, R. (2020). Peran Penting Dukungan Sosial Orangtua Terhadap Karakter Siswa Dalam Menghadapi Era Society 5.0. G-Couns: Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 4(2), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.31316/g.couns.v4i2.816

Romero-Rodríguez, J.-M., Ramírez-Montoya, M.-S., Buenestado-Fernández, M., & Lara-Lara, F. (2023). Use of ChatGPT at University as a Tool for Complex Thinking: Students’ Perceived Usefulness. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(2), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.7.1458

Salifu, I., Arthur, F., Arkoful, V., Nortey, S. A., & Oseo-Yaw, R. S. (2024). Economics students’ behavioural intention and usage of ChatGPT in higher education: a hybrid structural equation modelling-artificial neural network approach. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2300177

Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1964). THE MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF COMMUNICATION. THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS PRESS.

Shuhaiber, A., Kuhail, M. A., & Salman, S. (2025). ChatGPT in higher education - A Student’s perspective. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 17, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100565

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Sobaih, A. E. E., Elshaer, I. A., & Hasanein, A. M. (2024). Examining Students’ Acceptance and Use of ChatGPT in Saudi Arabian Higher Education. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 14, 709–721. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14030047

Strzelecki, A. (2024a). Acceptance and use of ChatGPT in the academic community. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 22943–22968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12765-1

Strzelecki, A. (2024b). Students’ Acceptance of ChatGPT in Higher Education: An Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Innovative Higher Education, 49, 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-023-09686-1

Studente, S., Ellis, S., & Garivaldis, S. F. (2020). Exploring the Potential of Chatbots in Higher Education: A Preliminary Study. International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 14(9), 768–771. https://publications.waset.org/10011432/exploring-the-potential-of-chatbots-in-higher-education-a-preliminary-study

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30036540

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. y. ., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology by Viswanath Venkatesh, James Y.L. Thong, Xin Xu :: SSRN. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2002388

Verkerke, J. H. (2012). Contract Doctrine: Theory and Practice (Vol. 1). CALI eLangdell Press.

Vimalkumar, M., Sharma, S. K., Singh, J. B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). ‘Okay google, what about my privacy?’: User’s privacy perceptions and acceptance of voice based digital assistants. Computers in Human Behavior, 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106763

Wang, Q., Li, C., & Zhu, L. (2024). ANALYSIS ON THE ACCEPTANCE OF AIGC TECHNOLOGY BY ART AND DESIGN STUDENTS IN UNIVERSITIES IN CHINA. ABAC Journal, 44(4), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.59865/abacj.2024.57

Wang, Y., & Zhang, W. (2023). Factors Influencing the Adoption of Generative AI for Art Designing Among Chinese Generation Z: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. IEEE Access, 11, 143272–143284. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3342055

Xu, S., Chen, P., & Zhang, G. (2024). Exploring Chinese University Educators’ Acceptance and Intention to Use AI Tools: An Application of the UTAUT2 Model. SAGE Open, 14(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241290013

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46576/jnm.v8i2.6167