PATH ANALYSIS PENGGUNAAN PAPAN TULIS INTERAKTIF DALAM PROSES PEMBELAJARAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL TASK-TECHNOLOGY FIT (TTF)

Mhd. Gifroni, Reni Aryani, Daniel Arsa

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penggunaan papan tulis interaktif dalam proses pembelajaran dengan menggunakan pendekatan Task Technology Fit (TTF). Pendekatan ini digunakan untuk mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi tingkat penggunaan teknologi serta dampaknya terhadap kinerja pembelajaran dosen. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kuantitatif dengan analisis jalur (path analysis). Data dikumpulkan melalui penyebaran kuesioner kepada dosen di lingkungan Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi Universitas Jambi, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan model struktural berbasis TTF. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa karakteristik tugas dan karakteristik teknologi berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap TTF. Selanjutnya, TTF berpengaruh signifikan terhadap tingkat penggunaan papan tulis interaktif (utilization) dan berdampak positif terhadap kinerja pembelajaran (performance impact). Dengan demikian, semakin tinggi kesesuaian antara teknologi dan kebutuhan tugas, semakin optimal pemanfaatan teknologi serta peningkatan efektivitas pembelajaran. Kesimpulannya, papan tulis interaktif merupakan teknologi pembelajaran yang efektif apabila sesuai dengan kebutuhan tugas dosen dan didukung oleh karakteristik teknologi yang relevan.


Keywords


Task Technology Fit, papan tulis interaktif, teknologi pendidikan.

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. ROY, “Technology in Teaching and Learning,” Int. J. Innov. Educ. Res., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 414–422, 2019, doi: 10.31686/ijier.vol7.iss4.1433.

M. Escueta, A. J. Nickow, P. Oreopoulos, and V. Quan, “Upgrading education with technology: Insights from experimental research,” J. Econ. Lit., vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 897–996, 2020, doi: 10.1257/JEL.20191507.

K. E. Oyetade, T. Zuva, and A. Harmse, “Technology adoption in education: A systematic literature review,” Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst., vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 108–112, 2020, doi: 10.25046/aj050611.

C. M.H, “Role of Technology in Indian Education,” J. Emerg. Technol. Innov. Res., 2019, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:216659767

Y. Mosina, “AN INTERACTIVE WHITEBOARD AS A SUPPORT TOOL TO A TEACHER,” Angl. Am., vol. 0, no. 16 SE-ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING AND THE ISSUES OF MULTILINGUALISM, Sep. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.15421/381911.

Y. Shi, J. Zhang, H. Yang, and H. H. Yang, “Effects of Interactive Whiteboard-based Instruction on Students’ Cognitive Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 283–300, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1769683.

J. Bilý and J. Miština, “Using an Interactive Whiteboard to Increase the Effectiveness of Teaching at Secondary Schools,” R&E-Source, pp. 38–49, 2023, doi: 10.53349/resource.2023.is1.a1189.

H. Nor Aini, M. Z. Sakinah, and A. Noraini, “The Use of Digital Whiteboard in Online Learning,” J. Intelek, vol. 18, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.24191/ji.v18i2.22175.

N. Andleeb, “Effect of Interactive White Board on Students’ Achievement at Early Grade Level,” Siazga Res. J., vol. 1, no. 1, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.58341/srj.v1i1.5.

S. S. Hassan, F. Nausheen, F. Scali, and R. Ettarh, “Interactive Whiteboard Technology Provides a Creative Teaching Modality for a Large Neuroanatomy Laboratory,” FASEB J., vol. 34, no. S1, p. 1, Apr. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.01885.

S. Reza Dashtestani, “Teaching EFL with Interactive Whiteboards: Do the Benefits Outweigh the Drawbacks? 1 Seyed Reza Dashtestani* 2,” 2051, doi: 10.22051/lghor.2019.26689.1139.

M. M. Mokoena, S. Simelane-Mnisi, and A. Mji, “Challenges and Solutions for Teachers’ Use of Interactive Whiteboards in High Schools,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 36–47, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2022.100104.

P. G. Subhaktiyasa, “PLS-SEM for Multivariate Analysis : A Practical Guide to Educational Research using SmartPLS,” vol. 4, no. 3, 2024.

J. F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt, N. P. Danks, and S. Ray, Evaluation of Formative Measurement Models. 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7_5.

S. C. Izah, L. Sylva, and M. Hait, “Cronbach’s Alpha: A Cornerstone in Ensuring Reliability and Validity in Environmental Health Assessment,” ES Energy Environ., vol. 23, pp. 1–14, 2024, doi: 10.30919/esee1057.

S. Panahi, A. Bazrafshani, and A. Mirzaie, “Development and validation of a modified LibQUAL scale in health sciences libraries: application of Structural Equation Modeling,” J. Med. Libr. Assoc., vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 792–801, 2023, doi: 10.5195/jmla.2023.1348.

H. A. Almusawi and C. M. Durugbo, “Linking task-technology fit, innovativeness, and teacher readiness using structural equation modelling,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 14899–14928, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-12440-x.

U. Mishra, “Individual performance and mobile banking: Role of task technology fit model,” J. Knowl. Innov., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 18–27, 2023, doi: 10.3126/jki.v9i1.53761.

S. Safira and W. Rofianto, “Task Technology Dan Technology Characteristics; Transformasi Mobile Banking Bank Mandiri Fitur New Release Livin’ By Mandiri Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kepuasan Serta Penggunaan Berkelanjutan Pada Nasabah Bank Mandiri,” J. Accounting, Manag. Islam. Econ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 237–250, 2023, doi: 10.35384/jamie.v1i1.437.

Y. H. Al-Mamary, A. A. Alfalah, A. Shamsuddin, and A. A. Abubakar, “Artificial intelligence powering education: ChatGPT’s impact on students’ academic performance through the lens of technology-to-performance chain theory,” J. Appl. Res. High. Educ., no. September, 2024, doi: 10.1108/JARHE-04-2024-0179.

P. Widagdo, T. Susanto, H. J. Setyadi, Haviluddin, M. Taruk, and H. S. Pakpahan, “THE USE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OF GENERATION Y IN THE INFLUENCE OF TASK TECHNOLOGY FIT THAT IMPACT ON INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE,” vol. 7, pp. 2258–2261, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://consensus.app/papers/the-use-of-information-technology-of-generation-y-in-the-widagdo-susanto/e922c2a1fe945d53bdd17ebcf31f9b96/

S. Ulfa, E. Surahman, I. Fatawi, and H. Tsukasa, “Task-Technology Fit Analysis: Measuring the Factors that influence Behavioural Intention to Use the Online Summary-with Automated Feedback in a MOOCs Platform,” Electron. J. e-Learning, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 63–77, 2024, doi: 10.34190/ejel.22.1.3094.

V. Rachel, C. Napitupulu, and G. S. Palupi, “Evaluasi Kinerja Implementasi Learning Management System (LMS) Maxy Academy Menggunakan Metode Task Technology Fit (TTF),” vol. 05, no. 02, pp. 27–33, 2024.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46576/device.v6i2.7874

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF – 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Mhd. Gifroni

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

DEVICE : JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEM, COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Terindeks pada:

   

Member Of :


DEVICE : JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEM, COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Published by :
FAKULTAS TEKNIK DAN ILMU KOMPUTER
PROGRAM STUDI SISTEM INFORMASI
UNIVERSITAS DHARMAWANGSA

Alamat : Jl. K. L. Yos Sudarso No. 224 Medan
Kontak : Tel. 061 6635682 - 6613783  Fax. 061 6615190
E-mail  : admin_device@dharmawangsa.ac.id

 Creative Commons License

Device : Journal Of Information System, Computer Science And Information Technology by Universitas Dharmawangsa is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Based on a work at http://jurnal.dharmawangsa.ac.id/index.php/device