Revocation of islamic inheritance rights to the recipient of the obligatory will perspective maslahah

Mhd Hasbi

doi:10.46576/lpj.v4i2.8197

Revocation of islamic inheritance rights to the recipient of the obligatory will perspective maslahah

Mhd Hasbi

Abstract

This study examines the issue of the cancellation of Islamic inheritance rights to the recipient of the obligatory will which is analyzed through the perspective of maslahah. The background of this study is the limitation of the regulation of mandatory wills in the compilation of Islamic law (KHI), especially Article 209, which does not explicitly regulate the mechanism for their cancellation, causing legal uncertainty in judicial practice. This research uses normative juridical method with conceptual approach and legislation. The results showed: first, the cancellation of the rights of the obligatory will can only be justified if it is based on causes recognized by the Shari'a, such as harming the heir or obstructive religious differences; second, the perspective of maslahah considers the cancellation to be legally valid if it aims to preserve greater benefits, but prohibited if it is carried out discriminatively; third, the absence of detailed arrangements on the mechanism for canceling the obligatory will in the KHI implies the weak protection of the recipient's civil rights. This study recommends a comprehensive renewal of the KHI in order to realize legal certainty and substantive justice in the Islamic inheritance system in Indonesia.

Keywords

Islamic Law, Inheritance, Maslahah.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akhsanty, Allya Shifa. “The Concept of Wasiat and Wasiat Wajibah in Indonesia From The Perspective of The Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI)” 2, no. August (2025): 72–94.

Faisal, Fedhli. “Hak Harta Bersama Dan Waris Janda Dari Perkawinan Poligami Yang Tercatat Tanpa Izin Dari Pengadilan Agama” 7, no. 3 (2025): 1261–74.

Gafur, Abdul. “Analisis Konsep Wasiat Wajibah Dalam Khi Dan Putusan Ma,” 2022, 1–27.

Ghafur, Abd, Dwi Aprilia Widyastutik, and Iftitah Firdausiyah. “Hukum Waris Islam : Kajian Komparatif Mazhab Fikih Dan Relevansinya Dengan KHI Di Indonesia” 4, no. 4 (2025): 6234–43.

Hastarini, Arvita. “Analisis Yuridis Pembatalan Akta Wasiat Yang Melibatkan Harta Bersama: Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1983 K/Pdt/2017” 7 (2026): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.22437/zaaken.v7i1.53452.

Ikbal, Muchamad, Oyo Sunaryo Mukhlas, and Beni Ahmad Saebeni. “Keabsahan Pelimpahan Porsi Haji Melalui Wasiat Wajibah Dan Transformasi Hukumnya Terhadap Hukum Islam,” no. September (2025).

Nurdiansyah, Agus. “Perbandingan Antara Wasiat Wajibah Mesir Dengan Ahli Waris Pengganti Dan Wasiat Wajibah Indonesia” 12, no. 2 (2023): 107–16.

Permadi, Iwan. “Problematika Hak Waris Atas Tanah Warisan Bagi Ahli Waris Beda Agama” 6, no. 193 (2023): 242–57. https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v6i2.19482.

Sahid, Kheeisya Arzeeta S. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Hibah Wasiat Kepada Anak Angkat Tanpa Persetujuan Ahli Waris Di Indonesia” 2, no. 2 (2025): 718–29.

Satriani, and Marilang. “Analisis Gugatan Pembatalan Adopsi Kepada Orang Tua Angkat Perspektif Hukum Islam” 2, no. 2 (2024): 107–18.

Science, Legal. “Penetapan Wasiat Wajibah Untuk Saudara Non Muslim Dalam Kajian Maslahat” 3, no. 3 (2025): 292–98.

Wijaya, Oming Ratna. “Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Agama Surabaya Tentang Wasiat Wajibah Bagi Suami Non Muslim Perspektif Hukum Islam” 03 (2023): 674–89.

Yamin, Mohamad. “The Expansion of Wasiat Wajibah : Protecting Legal Certainty and Fairness in Indonesian Inheritance Law,” 2026.

Yuridis, Analisis, Ketentuan Pembuatan, and Surat Wasiat. “Analisis Yuridis Ketentuan Pembuatan Surat Wasiat Berkaitan Dengan Pembagian Warisan Apabila Tidak Ada Keluarga Sedarah Pada Garis Lurus Ke Atas Dan Ke Bawah Sesuai Dengan Ketentuan KUH Perdata Dan KHI” 2 (2024): 1–11.

PERATURAN

“Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 Tentang Penyebarluasan Kompilasi Hukum Islam,” 1991, 1–2.

“Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama,” 2006.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46576/lpj.v4i2.8197